Talk to us Risks to Watch

The Top Five Trends in the IAM Space for 2024 

Overview 

Identity and Access Management (IAM) technology is an indispensable tool for building the foundation for Zero Trust security and critical for ensuring workforce and IT administrative experience. Therefore, it is important to align IAM technology with the latest trends in IT security, necessary to meet the emerging needs and use case requirements. 

While ARCON organizes mindshare programs all over the world with its esteemed customers and partners to understand emerging needs, active participation and interaction at global conferences paves the way to learn, observe, and understand new demands, trends, and expectations from security and risk management leaders.  

Having taken part in some of the biggest events like Gartner Security and Risk Management summits, GISEC event, KuppingerCole’s European Identity Cloud conference among many others, ARCON has identified the top five trends that are shaping the future of IAM technology. 

Let us delve deeper into it. 

(I) Convergence of IAM 

Technological convergence is all about integration, merging or blending of two or multiple technologies to create a new product. It can replace single-function technologies and provide an alternative product offering. 

It offers convenience to users and admins, saves time, and energy. For business owners, understanding technological convergence can increase their organization’s competitiveness. 

The convergence of Privileged Access Management (PAM) and Identity and Access Management (IAM) is a significant trend in the cybersecurity landscape today. It matters a lot to both the enterprises and vendors because of – 

  • Blurring Boundaries: Extensive remote workforce and cloud adoption has blurred the lines between ordinary users and highly privileged users. As a result, practices from PAM are migrating to IAM space creating demands for mergers. SRM leaders want a single pane of glass for administering IAM, PAM, IGA, MFA and SSO use cases.  
  • Enhanced Controls: IAM solutions now rigorously monitor user activity, enforce least privilege principles, and experiment with just-in-time access. So why not just merge with PAM? 
  • Mandatory Authentication: One of the top security and monitoring features of PAM – Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is becoming a standard in IAM deployments resulting in mergers. 
  • Zero Standing Privileges: Some IAM implementations grant no permanent special permissions, ensuring all access to sensitive areas is just-in-time (JIT) access. 

ARCON solution: Converged Identity 

(II)  Endpoint Privilege Security 

The endpoint security is no longer confined to detecting malware on endpoint but also to controlling and monitoring endpoint privileges. The attack surface increases significantly if there are no role and rule-based controls to regularize access to business-critical applications from endpoints. The challenge increases since the rising number of remote workforce access applications and cloud resources outside the perimeter of an organization. Against this backdrop, SRM leaders are looking to complement PAM with an added layer of Endpoint Privilege Management (EPM) security.  

ARCON solution: Endpoint Privilege Management 

(III) Hassle-free On-boarding/ Deboarding for Privileged Accounts  

It is a common administrative process to create privileged accounts and onboard privileged identities whenever necessary. However, managing these privileged accounts has been challenging due to the proliferation of the number of privileged accounts. Reasons like “domino” effect or shift of jobs (transfer), or new use cases, the number of dormant accounts pile up, so do privileged identities. It poses huge risks to the enterprise data assets as ungoverned accounts could be the source of a data breach, data abuse or cyber espionage. 

As a result, demand for automated and hassle-free onboarding and deboarding have gained momentum. Most of the SRM leaders look for automated onboarding of all privileged accounts from all IT environments such as: 

• Microsoft Active Directory   

• Amazon Web Services  

• Azure Active Directory  

• Google Cloud Platform 

Automated onboarding of privileged identities process involves the use of technology to streamline the integration of privileged accounts into an organization’s security infrastructure. This process typically includes the discovery, management, and monitoring of privileged accounts to ensure they are securely managed from the moment they are created. 

By automating the onboarding of privileged identities, organizations can reduce administrative overhead, minimize the risk of human error, and ensure that no system is left unmanaged. It is a crucial part of a robust identity governance strategy, especially in complex IT environments. 

ARCON solution: Privileged Access Management 

(V) Automation 

Automation in the IT security industry refers to the use of technology to perform recurring security tasks with minimal human intervention. It is designed to improve efficiency, reduce human error, and enhance the accuracy of security operations. Hence, there is an escalating demand for it in the industry, especially because infrastructures and networks grow both in size and complexity. 

The rise of automation in IT security is driven by several factors. Here are some key reasons: 

  • Defensive Capabilities: Automation focuses on enhancing defensive capabilities, such as security operations center (SOC) countermeasures. By automating repetitive tasks, security teams can respond more efficiently to threats and incidents. 
  • Identity and Access Management (IAM): Labor-intensive activities like IAM and log activity reporting have huge benefits from automation. It streamlines processes, reduces manual errors, and ensures consistent enforcement of access controls. 
  • Changing Attack Patterns: AI (Artificial Intelligence) and machine learning are used to stay ahead of evolving attack patterns. Automation helps security professionals adapt quickly to new threats and vulnerabilities. 

(V) Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) 

The industry leaders continuously try to stay updated so that they can offer the best of the best IT security infrastructure to their organizations. However, vulnerabilities are unpredictable. Hence, to stay unaffected by any unprecedented incident, organizations are now looking for robust ITDR (Identity Threat Detection and Response) mechanisms. It is one of the evolving trends as there is a massive sprawl of identities that includes employees, third parties and vendors. Hence, the source of threat is always unpredictable. 

To build a proactive security posture, ITDR is emerging as one of the top requirements. Organizations are looking to move a step ahead of conventional IAM practice and embrace ITDR capabilities. Embedding ITDR capabilities with IAM and PAM systems helps security pros to identify real-time security risks and mitigate threats. The reasons behind the same are: 

  • ITDR comprehends the zero-trust approach once embedded with IAM and PAM systems, and it allows IT security professionals to verify anomalous profiles (IDs) within the network continuously.  
  • Implementation of ITDR capabilities helps to mitigate identity-based threats. It identifies identity-centric threats in real-time and takes adequate measures to build a proactive security posture which ensures business resilience. 
  • ITDR helps to identify anomalous behavioral profiles in both on-cloud and hybrid work environments and enables security leaders to take an appropriate measure by remediating risks. ITDR offers 360-degree threat insights over all identities that deviate from the sanctioned baseline activities.  

Hence, the demand for ITDR is skyrocketing. Implementing ITDR capabilities amidst more digital identity-based threats is important to reinforce a robust IAM posture. 

ARCON solution: Privileged Access Management 

Conclusion 

Following trends in IT and IT security industry is crucial to inspire innovation, have competitive advantage, and meet customer expectations. The above-mentioned trends identified by ARCON, if followed judiciously and strategically, can control, manage, and mitigate IT security risks in the long run. 

Role Based Access Control and Policy Based Access Control: Understanding the Basics

About well-defined Access Control in Enterprises

A well-defined access control mechanism is quintessential for maintaining security and managing user access permissions. Organizations always strive hard to strike the right chord when it comes to IT security, IT efficiency and IT operational continuity.

Now, streamlining access control mechanisms can be done in two separate ways.

  • Role Based Access Control (RBAC)
  • Policy Based Access Control (PBAC)

Now the question is which one is better and relevant for your organization? RBAC streamlines access management by allocating users’ rights and privileges according to their assigned roles. PBAC, on the other hand, bases access rights and permissions on policies. The decisions about which users can access which system and when are completely based on these policies.

The formulation of any of these access control policies depends on the organization’s size, IT security practices, deployment of solutions, and policy management. In this blog, we have done a deep-delved analysis of RBAC and PBAC. It explains which access control model is suitable for which organization, how and why.

What is Role Based Access Control (RBAC)?

Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) mechanism plays a pivotal role in managing and controlling access to multiple digital resources within an organization. This approach assigns permissions and privileges to individuals or entities based on their roles and responsibilities. According to RBAC,

  • Roles are created for various job functions within an organization.
  • Permissions to perform specific operations are assigned to these roles.
  • Users acquire permissions indirectly through their assigned roles, simplifying common tasks like adding users or changing departments.

The three primary rules that govern RBAC are:

  • Role assignment: A user can exercise a permission only if they have been assigned a role.
  • Role authorization: A user’s active role must be authorized under any circumstance.
  • Permission authorization: A user can exercise permission only if it is authorized for their active role.

Role Based Access Control can be used to facilitate security administration in large organizations with numerous users and permissions. It is different from mandatory access control (MAC) and discretionary access control (DAC) but can enforce these policies without complications.

What is Policy Based Access Control (PBAC)?

Policy-Based Access Control (PBAC) mechanism manages user access to critical systems and data repositories as per organizational policies. In PBAC, the role of the user combines with access policies to determine the privileges they should be granted. Here is how it works:

  • Flexibility to be Fine-Grained: PBAC supports contextual controls that allow policies to be set up to allow access to resources from specific locations and times, as well as to assess the linkages that exist between identities and resources. It is simple to create, remove, or modify groups of users, and it only takes a click to remove outdated rights.
  • Easy to Create and Test Policies: It is less challenging for the SRM (Security Risk Management) team to create a policy that must be followed by users or group of users irrespective of their roles and strength in respective departments. Not only that, but there is also regular testing of the policies to ensure that new additions or amendments are incorporated successfully.
  • PBAC gives Transparency and Visibility: Establishing a robust access management policy begins with visualizing and mapping the relationship between the identities and the resources. Administrators can see who has permission to do what regarding all organizational assets thanks to PBAC. It improves cybersecurity, fills up security loopholes left by RBAC, and provides a proactive approach to complying with Data and Privacy regulations.

Unlike Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), PBAC allows rapid privilege changes based on new regulations or corporate policies without extensive role adjustments throughout the organization. Benefits of PBAC include consistent security policy enforcement, reduced administrative overhead, improved security, and the ability to audit and report user activity for compliance purposes.

Differentiating Analysis

Here is a detailed comparison of the two access control mechanisms/models.

Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)Policy-Based Access Control (PBAC)
This works as per individual roles and
responsibilities of users or group of users
in any department of an organization
This works as per access control policy of an organization or any department of the organization irrespective of the number of users and their roles
RBAC provides more granular level
monitoring and access control security to
the IT Infrastructure
PBAC helps organizations to enforce an overall access control that is applicable to the entire organization or a department
RBAC can be implemented without PBACPBAC cannot be implemented without RBAC i.e., the role of the user combines with organizational policies
It restricts user access based on static
roles
It does not restrict user access based on roles but only on pre-defined policies
Being role-based authorization
mechanism, it does not consider other
security controls, e.g., user IP or time of
the day
Authorization in PBAC is based on device, location, time, and other security controls
RBAC requires manual intervention/
management
PBAC on the other hand is dynamic and automated
Scaling RBAC could be difficult, may lead
to role explosion
PBAC is flexible and easily scalable
It helps organizations to stay compliant
with the IT standards and regulations
Might have limitations in staying compliant with the regulatory bodies, organizations might require do amendments in the IT security policies once latest updates/ amendments happen in the standards

How ARCON Supports RBAC and PBAC

ARCON | Privileged Access Management (PAM) solution provides IT security and risk management team with adequate security capabilities needed to manage, monitor, and control privileged users. The solution provides best-in-class security features that includes fine-grained controls, rule, and role-based access control (RBAC), just-in-time (JIT) privileges, multi-factor authentication (MFA), password vaulting, session monitoring, customized reporting, and many other classic PAM capabilities to address some of the most complex use-case challenges.

ARCON | Endpoint Privilege Management (EPM) ensures rule-based (policy-based) access control mechanism for enterprises seamlessly. Moreover, endpoint privileges are granularly controlled and restricted through time-based, day-based, and duration-based parameters. ARCON | EPM offers File Integrity Monitoring (FIM) feature that helps IT administrators to identify unapproved or unauthorized changes made on files in end-user devices and take necessary actions (rollbacks if needed) while keeping track of file history. This is an advantage of PBAC.

Conclusion

RBAC and PBAC models are common parts of Identity and Access Management (IAM) practices in organizations worldwide. However, which one best fits your IT infrastructure depends on organization to organization. According to business needs, IT security requirements, IT operational efficiency and compliance mandates, SRM leaders opt for the suitable model.